SHF posts #7 - i

'imaginary number': i



This may be the most misunderstood concept in modern history [by those who follow Boolean logic, not normal people].


Why this idea, of an 'unreal' counterpart to things we define as real [externally, objectively in the 'scientific era'] should cause such confusion when we are permanently faced with the situation of having 'the real thing' we might be considering literally in our hand and our mind simultaneously, I don't know.


Then there is the idea of conscious mind and unconscious mind. Awake, sleep, etc...


The idea that an 'imaginary' counterpart is necessary to 'real' concepts is so obvious that I suppose 'we' forgot all about it?



I don't know, it seems like a huge failing on the part of the people developing mathematics not to realise this....


....until you remember that this complex-n double-arrow fractal-brainworld Universe actually does things for 'a reason'!



The reason being - BALANCE - complex-style.




So, we were supposed to struggle with the concept of i, until we got to this system re-start.

In case anyone is worried about the "R" [religion] word being under threat here...


Science was missing something and couldn't solve Quantum Mechanics for over 12o years - it was missing religion!

Religion was also in need of science but had crossed that bridge eons ago.



So, put religion & science together and what have you got?




LOVE [inc. Quantum world now it is as simple as ABC]

So, where were we? Quantum Entanglement.


Perhaps the single most unanticipated fabulous new feature in our new Universe ∞.0.



Remember we had two wheels?

Something is missing here - three things.


We turned one around - that was like looking at the back, except we turned it around to make it the front...



Suppose we don't need to turn it around to consider the back view.


This is how we can consider 'imaginary' counterparts to real ones most simply, natural logic [complex logic].


That is to say, you don't need to turn one of the wheels around to know that you can match the rotation direction by imagining the spacial 'flip' [equivalent to actually turning the wheel to see the back].






That's it. Imaginary numbers, that is.

Last piece of the puzzle incoming....